A couple of posts ago I alluded to the fact that Spiderman 3 was a terrible movie.
I have decided to use this lull in new post ideas as an oppurtunity to back up that statement.
My friend Krazy Ivan actually enjoyed the film greatly and so I want to challenge him to write a rebuttal view on his blog. (you can get to it on my list of Like Minded Outpatients on the main page of CALMIXX.WORDPRESS.COM) In essence this will be kind of like a “Dance off” in Breakin’ 2 Electric Boogaloo. But not as timely.
Okay, here we go.
Spiderman 3 was terrible.
There.
That was easier than i expected it to be.
LOL – Ok, ok, seriously.
And now a list of all of the reasons Spiderman 3 was terrible and Sam Raimi hates you.
1. The opening credits did not have any Alex Ross art. Alex Ross art makes everything better.
2.You only see Venom for 2 minutes and 13 seconds. (literally – time it)
3. Peter Parker cries. Alot! Seriously. Every 12 minutes he breaks down like he’s in a scene from freaking Terms of Endearment.
4. Gwen Stacey was supposed to die on the 59th street bridge at the hands of the Green Goblin in the first Spiderman movie. Since she did not and instead was replaced with Mary Jane in that movie, she should not have even BEEN in this movie to remind us that she should have already been dead.
5. Gwen Stacy is much more interesting than Mary Jane Watson. Period. No contest. When Mary Jane and Peter break up I shouldn’t feel like it’s a good thing.
6. Peter Parker should never under any circumstances be in a dance number. The scene in the jazz club reminds me of the dance number in Return of the Jedi except the dance number in Return of the Jedi had hot dancing alien girls and that almost sorta makes me forget all the muppets. The dance number in Spiderman 3 sent me LOOKING for muppets.
7. The Sandman killed Uncle Ben, Darth Vader built C3P0 and Anakin and Greedo had a fist fight on Tattoonie 40 years before Han Solo shot him in self defense. The whole Hollywood universe is 3 and a half blocks long.
8. Harry’s butler has known for 2 years that Spiderman did not kill his father. He just neglected to bring it up until it was needed as a plot device. Furthermore, the reason he knows this is because the wounds appeared to have been caused by the Goblin’s glider. Why is this dude a butler? Apparently he has mad CSI skills that are just going to waste while he serves tea and crumpets to his imbecile employer.
9. Harry hits his head and forgets that he knows Peter’s secret and hates him. This made more sense when it happened on Gilligan’s Island.
10. When Spiderman finally catches up with the Sandman, he takes off his mask, cries some more, and lets him go. The crowd in my theatre was on their feet cheering the assistance that Spidey gave the justice system. Hey news flash folks – When Batman finds the bad guy – the bad guy GOES TO JAIL. Spiderman shouldn’t get to give the guy a pardon. He did more than kill YOUR uncle Spiderman! What about Aunt May? Does SHE get any choice about this? Do you think Uncle Ben is HAPPY NOW? Go deliver some more pizzas with your powers you crybaby emo lookin’ punk.
Hey, James Franco really wasn’t too bad in this movie as Harry.
The first 20 minutes are actually pretty good. But then we get a moment when Stan Lee says “I guess one man can make a difference”.
Go rent Spiderman 3 and see if you don’t agree that from this EXACT POINT, the movie sucks.
In my opinion, that is because Sam Raimi did not want to make a movie with Venom. He was forced to by SONY. That’s why Venom is hardly even in the the flick and when he is, he is used the same way BANE was in the Batman and Robin movie. He’s just there for more toy fodder. So Mr. Raimi gave us 20 minutes of the movie he WANTED to make and then phoned the rest in. To screw SONY. And us.
For the record, Venom LOOKS great and the SAND effects were very well done. But that has little to do with Sam Raimi. I’m sure the artists working in the effects houses were THRILLED to work on Venom and Sandman.
But the first 2 Spiderman movies were not sucesses because they had great special effects. Spiderman 2 is probably the best comic book movie ever made, because of the STORY and the actors. This same team just totally MISSED it in Spiderman 3.
So come on, Krazy Ivan – how are you going to argue with THAT?



February 28, 2008 at 6:57 pm
You really do have Super Hero Issues my Pirate friend….I enjoyed Spiderman 3 for what it was, just a movie, a comic book movie at that. I agree with your argument that some parts of the movie are silly, i.e. the butler, Harry’s amnesia, but….this is a COMIC BOOK MOVIE!!!!! It’s fictional. You do realize that there really is no Spiderman or Sandman or Green Goblin. You and I differ on many movie issues but you cannot argue that I just took the movie for what it was, 2 Hours of entertainment. I do not care that Peter cried for 30 minutes of the movie or that Gwen Stacy did not die on the 59th street bridge…..side note, you have entirely too much comic book knowledge and I do know that you wear a cape under your clothes and have a light sabre under your car seat.
Come On Calmixx!!!! Stop taking these Comic Book Movies to heart. By the way how many times have you watched Spiderman 3? This movie that sucks so much. The movie that came with the PS3 system you have. The movie that you got on a bootleg…….
I think my point has been proven!!!! Until next time, keep it clean
February 28, 2008 at 7:18 pm
[...] My friend Calmixx is a movie bufff just like me, so he and I speak about alot of movies and we definitely don’t agree on some. So to entice him. Here are my Top 10 Movies of all time….so [...]
February 29, 2008 at 7:04 am
First off, I agree with Calmixx guy and have to say that Spiderman 3 does suck wholeheartedly. 2 hours of “entertainment”??? More like 2 hours and 19 minutes waste of my freaking time.
I do not agree on some of the points made by my comic book loving friend over here, I do agree that Sam Raimi should not have been associated with this movie. In the same way that Uwe Boll should not be associated with anymore video game movies.
I don’t know about the cape under his clothes, but I would bet my Xbox 360 system he has some tights on under his clothes.
On a side note, KrazyIvan rebuttal that this movie is “fictional” is the funniest thing I have ever read in a blog. KrazyIvan….thanks for stating the overly obvious.
February 29, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Hey Matt….I’m beginning to get the sense that you are a blog hater…..You are very harsh with your opinions. You may think that Spiderman 3 was a waste of your time, but I didn’t. Just because someone doesn’t agree with you point of view, you shouldn’t go around bashing them…..my 2 cents!
Bottom Line…..We all have different views on movies, games, etc., but just take it for what it is, “Entertainment”!!!!!!
Calmixx may have Super Hero issues, but you have anger issues my friend……
February 29, 2008 at 8:45 pm
Why do you say that krazyivan??? Was it the “but I would bet my Xbox 360 system he has some tights on under his clothes” comment.
Alright…..sorry Calmixx for that comment. If you really do wear tights under your clothes I respect you for that. I guess that is a cool way of expressing yourself.
See….all better now??
February 29, 2008 at 10:18 pm
So uh, who let the secret out about my cape and tights? IT IS A UNIFORM! I wear it to FIGHT CRIME . . . uh, I uh see your point I guess . . . (but the light sabre stays right where it is . . . )